<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Algebraic + abstract = true?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.davber.com/2006/09/02/algebraic-abstract-true/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.davber.com/2006/09/02/algebraic-abstract-true/</link>
	<description>Functional functional programming - Haskell, Ruby, Erlang, Scala...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:38:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: davber does IT &#187; Algebraic + abstract = true! (at least in the key of F#)</title>
		<link>http://blog.davber.com/2006/09/02/algebraic-abstract-true/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>davber does IT &#187; Algebraic + abstract = true! (at least in the key of F#)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 06:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davber.com/2006/09/02/algebraic-abstract-true/#comment-274</guid>
		<description>[...] I earlier wrote about some ideas I had to combine the encapsulation of abstract data types with the swift case analysis combined with decomposition of algebraic types. Why not have both worlds? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I earlier wrote about some ideas I had to combine the encapsulation of abstract data types with the swift case analysis combined with decomposition of algebraic types. Why not have both worlds? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
