Comments on: cpsh – a Windows executable http://blog.davber.com/2006/12/10/cpsh-a-windows-executable/ Functional functional programming - Haskell, Ruby, Erlang, Scala... Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:38:57 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: davber does IT » cpsh 1.0 http://blog.davber.com/2006/12/10/cpsh-a-windows-executable/comment-page-1/#comment-40 davber does IT » cpsh 1.0 Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:18:18 +0000 http://blog.davber.com/2006/12/10/cpsh-a-windows-executable/#comment-40 [...] For more information, see earlier post. [...] [...] For more information, see earlier post. [...]

]]> By: ben http://blog.davber.com/2006/12/10/cpsh-a-windows-executable/comment-page-1/#comment-37 ben Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:19:55 +0000 http://blog.davber.com/2006/12/10/cpsh-a-windows-executable/#comment-37 One word.. AWESOME! I am downloading GCC right now. I will tell you, if you can get this to work with VC++ 8, I would pay $50 for it. I really really would. I know I'm but one dude. But this would just be an awesome tool. In fact nothing would be better than having it sit on top of a wide number of popular compilers, throw in the Intel compiler as well. It would be a great way of testing the differences in compliance of the standard, as well as the efficiency of the code. For that, I would probably pay a full $350, or more.. One word.. AWESOME! I am downloading GCC right now. I will tell you, if you can get this to work with VC++ 8, I would pay $50 for it. I really really would. I know I’m but one dude. But this would just be an awesome tool. In fact nothing would be better than having it sit on top of a wide number of popular compilers, throw in the Intel compiler as well. It would be a great way of testing the differences in compliance of the standard, as well as the efficiency of the code.

For that, I would probably pay a full $350, or more..

]]>