Comments on: abstract_fsm – finite state machines in C++ http://blog.davber.com/2009/12/08/abstract_fsm-finite-state-machines-in-c/ Functional functional programming - Haskell, Ruby, Erlang, Scala... Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:38:57 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: chenry http://blog.davber.com/2009/12/08/abstract_fsm-finite-state-machines-in-c/comment-page-1/#comment-649 chenry Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:38:57 +0000 http://blog.davber.com/?p=65#comment-649 I like the idea. Most of all I like the in-place action definition. If you do the same for guards, which should not be too complicated, you start having an interesting syntax. What I would like to see: - guards - allow truly terminal states And I think you will then have what many users will ever need for basic machines. I like the idea. Most of all I like the in-place action definition. If you do the same for guards, which should not be too complicated, you start having an interesting syntax. What I would like to see:
- guards
- allow truly terminal states

And I think you will then have what many users will ever need for basic machines.

]]>