<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>davber does IT &#187; AJAX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.davber.com/cat/ajax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.davber.com</link>
	<description>Functional functional programming - Haskell, Ruby, Erlang, Scala...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:30:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Finding and traversing DOM elements in JavaScript</title>
		<link>http://blog.davber.com/2006/09/01/finding-and-traversing-dom-elements-in-javascript/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.davber.com/2006/09/01/finding-and-traversing-dom-elements-in-javascript/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 05:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AJAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language Reviews]]></category>
<category>AJAX</category><category>C++</category><category>cpsh</category><category>firefox</category><category>haxe</category><category>ie</category><category>javascript</category><category>Language Reviews</category><category>performance</category><category>prototype</category><category>script</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davber.com/2006/09/01/finding-and-traversing-dom-elements-in-javascript/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you have to furnish a lot of HTML elements from JavaScript, such as for formatting or inserting special effects? Well, then you need to know the performance - or lack thereof - of finding and traversing DOM elements. And the performance hit of using Microsoft's browser.
This post tries to clarify the performance hits involved. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.davber.com/2006/09/01/finding-and-traversing-dom-elements-in-javascript/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is your language hot or not?</title>
		<link>http://blog.davber.com/2006/08/26/is-your-language-hot-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.davber.com/2006/08/26/is-your-language-hot-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AJAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C++]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Functional Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruby]]></category>
<category>.NET</category><category>AJAX</category><category>c# 2.0</category><category>C++</category><category>erlang</category><category>Functional Programming</category><category>google</category><category>haxe</category><category>Java</category><category>javascript</category><category>language comparison</category><category>Language Reviews</category><category>Ruby</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davber.com/2006/08/26/is-your-language-hot-or-not/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If one would measure popularity by number of hits on Google, these are the five most popular computer languages:

PHP
Java
C
Flash
Perl

A graph of Google hits, using the query +lang +programming, for some of the most common languages follows. NOTE 1: please inform me if your favorite language is omitted. NOTE 2: I did not include the language [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.davber.com/2006/08/26/is-your-language-hot-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prototype arrays &#8211; improving upon Ajax?</title>
		<link>http://blog.davber.com/2006/08/24/prototype-arrays-improving-upon-ajax/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.davber.com/2006/08/24/prototype-arrays-improving-upon-ajax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AJAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools Reviews]]></category>
<category>AJAX</category><category>associative arrays</category><category>hash</category><category>prototype</category><category>Ruby</category><category>Tools Reviews</category><category>wrapper</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davber.com/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is this popular wrapper for common JavaScript idioms, called Prototype. I will not explain it - since that is done elsewhere - nor praise it. What I will do is to look critically at one part of this library, the array extensions.
This library is used by most fancy AJAX libraries popping up, whether they [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.davber.com/2006/08/24/prototype-arrays-improving-upon-ajax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AJAX and IE caching problems</title>
		<link>http://blog.davber.com/2006/08/22/ajax-and-ie-caching-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.davber.com/2006/08/22/ajax-and-ie-caching-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 06:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AJAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
<category>AJAX</category><category>browser</category><category>cache</category><category>ie</category><category>javascript</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>xhr</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davber.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spent hours today trying to make IE 6.0 less intelligent. I.e., to get it not to cache the AJAX responses.
The first attempts, to include
PLAIN TEXT
HTML4STRICT:




&#60;meta http-equiv="Pragma" content="no-cache" /&#62; 






in the head portion of the HTML sent back to the client was laughed at by IE 6.
So, I use a search engine called Google to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.davber.com/2006/08/22/ajax-and-ie-caching-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AJAX using one language</title>
		<link>http://blog.davber.com/2006/08/20/ajax-using-one-language/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.davber.com/2006/08/20/ajax-using-one-language/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 01:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davber</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AJAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools Reviews]]></category>
<category>AJAX</category><category>ecmascript</category><category>google</category><category>gwt</category><category>haxe</category><category>Java</category><category>javascript</category><category>Language Reviews</category><category>ror</category><category>Ruby</category><category>Tools Reviews</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.davber.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AJAX is a bunch of cryptic JavaScript snippets on the client side together with some advanced web services, written in another, and more powerful, language. Right? Not necessarily. I here give a brief comparison of three ways to create AJAX applications with only one language, running on both client and server.
The three unilinguistic approaches to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.davber.com/2006/08/20/ajax-using-one-language/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

